A Control Layer Above the Systems You Already Run
Operations software for marine survey and offshore data operations — tender to closeout, mobilization readiness, offshore daily reporting, processing and QA/QC state, and client deliverables with manifests and checksums.
Sound
Familiar?
Common problems we solve for marine & offshore businesses.
The project spans a tender, a mobilization, and a data delivery. Nothing spans all three.
→One project record that begins at the tender and ends at closeout, carrying scope, commercial terms, mobilization, acquisition, processing, and delivery. The acquisition and processing software keeps doing its job — this is the layer that knows where the project is.
Vessel and crew readiness is confirmed by email the week before mobilization
→Readiness tracked as state rather than correspondence — certification and expiry per role, equipment availability and calibration status, and the specific items outstanding against a mobilization date, visible before the week before.
Mobilization checklists are per-project documents that get rebuilt each time
→Mobilization templates by operation type, instantiated per project, with owner and due date per item. What was learned on the last mobilization is in the template rather than in somebody's saved copy.
Daily field reporting from offshore competes with bandwidth and a working shift
→Reporting designed for a constrained link and a busy bridge — structured entry, offline capture, and sync when the link allows. Progress, downtime and its cause, weather, and line kilometres or stations completed, rolled up onshore without a phone call.
Processing and QA/QC state is known to the processor and nobody else
→Processing status per data set and per pass, with QA/QC checks recorded as they are performed and by whom. When a client asks which version is current, the answer is a lookup rather than a conversation.
Client deliverables need manifests and checksums assembled by hand
→Delivery packages built from the project record — file inventory, checksums, coverage, and revision, generated with the package rather than typed alongside it. The manifest and the delivery cannot disagree because one produces the other.
Laboratory coordination happens in a separate thread from the project it belongs to
→Sample chain of custody, laboratory dispatch, turnaround, and results tracked against the project and the station they came from, so analytical status is part of project status rather than a parallel conversation.
What We Build
Custom software designed specifically for marine & offshore operations.
Tender-to-Closeout Lifecycle
One record from tender through award, mobilization, acquisition, processing, delivery, and closeout — with commercial terms and scope attached to the same project the field team is working.
Vessel & Crew Readiness
Certification and expiry by role, equipment availability and calibration state, and outstanding items against a mobilization date. Readiness as a status you can query, not a thread you have to read.
Mobilization Planning
Templates by operation type instantiated per project, with owner and due date per item — so each mobilization starts from accumulated practice rather than from last project's document.
Offshore Daily Reporting
Built for a constrained link: structured entry, offline capture, sync when available. Progress, downtime and cause, weather, and completed lines or stations rolled up onshore automatically.
Processing, QA/QC & Deliverables
Processing state per data set and pass, QA/QC checks recorded as performed, and delivery packages that generate their own manifest and checksums from the project record.
Laboratory Coordination
Chain of custody, dispatch, turnaround, and results tracked against the project and station — analytical status as part of project status.
Marine & Offshore software, answered directly
Is this a CRM?
Yes. Aeopic builds custom CRM software for marine & offshore businesses — contacts, pipeline, scheduling, activity history, and reporting are all part of it. The difference is what sits at the centre of the record: your project deliverable, not a generic "deal". Tender-to-closeout project lifecycle, Vessel and crew readiness tracking, and Mobilization planning run inside the same system rather than in three separate tools that don't talk to each other.
What does an AI operating system actually do?
An AI-integrated operating system is a custom CRM with your operations built into it and an AI layer that can read all of it. For marine & offshore work, that means the system tracks processing and QA/QC state across a data set, assembles the delivery manifest with checksums, and surfaces the readiness item that will hold a mobilization. The AI is not a chatbot bolted onto the side — it has access to the same project deliverables, documents, and history your team does, and every action it takes is reviewable.
How is this different from a general project-management tool with a document library?
Off-the-shelf software asks you to describe marine & offshore work in its vocabulary, so you end up with custom fields standing in for project deliverables and a spreadsheet holding whatever wouldn't fit — which is how you get a delivery held because nobody could say which pass of processing was current. A custom platform uses your vocabulary from the start. You also stop paying per seat, and adding a capability is a change to software you own rather than another subscription.
Do I own the code?
Yes. You own the source code, the database, and the deployment. There is no per-seat license, no vendor who can raise your rate, and no feature that can be sunset out from under you. If you stop working with Aeopic, your project deliverables and the system that manages them keep running, and any competent developer can maintain the codebase.
Integrate the Layer That's Missing, Not the Ones That Work
Your acquisition and processing software does what it is good at. Let's build the operations layer above it — written for a technical product owner, with no claim that it replaces a scientific system.
No obligation · Response within 24 hours · Full code ownership